United States v. Marjorie Williams, United States of America v. Walter Moore

96 F.3d 1452 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marjorie WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50402, 95-50413. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1996. Decided Sep. 04, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 I. WILLIAMS. 3 Sufficiency of the Evidence. 4 There was ample evidence from which the district court could have found that Williams conspired to, and did, commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 1344. Williams was having financial problems. GER (Williams) 103. She lived with Moore, her brother. Williams's ER 207. On a day when Williams's supervisor was away on a pre-arranged trip, Moore's friend Laurent approached Williams at the bank where she worked as a teller. GER (Williams) 57-58, 102-03, 110-11, 285. Williams…