Everett Associates, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance

Good Law
35 F. App'x 450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 2002Nos. 01-15601, 01-15768; D.C. No. CV-97-04308-SCCalifornia1,200 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*451 MEMORANDUM *

Transcontinental Insurance Co. (“Trans-con”) appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment for Everett Associates, Inc. and Donald Payne (“Payne”) (collectively “Everett”) holding that Trans-con breached its duty to defend Everett. Everett cross-appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment for Transcon dismissing Everett’s claims for indemnification, bad faith, emotional distress and economic injury damages, negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 We reverse the district court’s partial summary judgment for Everett and its denial of partial summary judgment for Transcon on Transeon’s duty to defend. We affirm the judgment in all other respects.

I

The district court held as a matter of law that Transcon breached its duty to defend Everett against allegations of patent infringement. Transcon argues that it had no duty to defend Everett against these allegations under the provisions of Everett’s commercial general liability policy. We agree. Everett’s policy cannot be interpreted to create a potential for coverage.

We apply California law as we predict the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.