Baltazar-Murrieta

United States v. Baltazar-Murrieta

Good Law
35 F. App'x 478
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 2002No. 01-50338; D.C. No. CR-00-03357-IEGCalifornia1,481 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Baltazar-Murietta was arrested when he drove a maroon 1988 Buick Regal concealing packages of marijuana across the Calexico, California Port of Entry on October 20, 2000. A jury convicted him of importing and possessing 39.82 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 960 and 841(a)(1). We reverse the district court’s denial of Baltazar-Murietta’s motion to suppress and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

We hold that the district court erred in denying Baltazar-Murietta’s motion to suppress the 12 packages of marijuana found between the metal and plastic panels of his car, because the search of the car may have constituted a nonroutine border search requiring reasonable suspicion. Although a routine border search, including an inspection of the passenger compartment of a car, does not require any level of suspicion, “in order to conduct a search that goes beyond the routine, an inspector *479 must have a reasonable suspicion that the person to be searched may be carrying contraband.” United States v. Molinar-Tarazon, 279 F.3d 709, 712 (9th Cir.2002).

It is unclear whether the search of Baltazar-Murietta’s car was routine or nonroutine. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.