Chateaubriand v. Gaspard

Caution
96 Daily Journal DAR 12203·97 F.3d 1218·12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 214·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26302·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 199695-36086California3,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1218 12 IER Cases 214 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7425 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12 ,203 Francisco CHATEAUBRIAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus GASPARD and Kate Brown Gaspard; Martin Brown and Betty Brown; Sid Snyder and Jane Doe Snyder; James Jesernig and Jane Doe Jesernig; and Paul Berendt and Jane Doe Berendt, Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-36086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1996. Decided Oct. 7, 1996. W. Dale Kamerrer, Law, Lyman, Daniel, Kamerrer & Bogdanovich, Olympia, WA, for defendants-appellants. Paul A. Lindenmuth, Law Offices of Neil J. Hoff, Tacoma, WA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-94-05641-FDB. Before WRIGHT, BEEZER and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 We must decide whether state legislators are immune from suit for allegedly firing an employee who opposed performing illegal political campaign activity. 2 * In 1985 the Washington State Senate Democratic Caucus (the "Caucus") hired Francisco Chateaubriand as a public information officer in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.