Monica Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

Bad Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 12193·97 F.3d 1227·35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 731·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26300·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7430
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 199695-15935California4,631 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1227 65 USLW 2234 , 35 Fed.R.Serv.3d 731 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7430 Monica VALENTINO; Michael A. Hackard; Hugo S. Jennings; Wanda S. O'Connor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CARTER-WALLACE, INC.; Wallace Laboratories, a division of Carter-Wallace, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-15935. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1996. Decided Oct. 7, 1996. Stephen R. Lang, Whitman, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City, for defendants-appellants. Elizabeth J. Cabraser and William B. Hirsch, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, San Francisco, California; Arthur Sherman, Sherman, Dan & Portugal, Beverly Hills, California, for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Eugene F. Lynch, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-94-02867-EFL. Before: SCHROEDER and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and REED, * District Judge. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 conditionally certifying a nationwide plaintiff class and subclass in a products liability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.