UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Pemba Rita SHERPA, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 12262·97 F.3d 1239·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26334·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 199695-50007, 95-50054California3,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Pemba Rita Sherpa, a native and citizen of Nepal, was convicted by a jury of possession of heroin with intent to distribute and of importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 952(a). The district court reduced Sherpa’s sentence pursuant to the “safety valve” provision of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform Act of 1994 (“MMSRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f), codified in the sentencing guidelines at § 5C1.2. Sherpa appealed his conviction and the Government cross-appealed the district court’s application of the “safety valve” provision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pemba Rita Sherpa (“Sherpa”) was bom in 1956 in Phortze, a small and rather primitive village in Nepal. All the people born in this area of Nepal have the surname “Sherpa.” Sherpas are known for their skills as trekkers, or “high altitude porters.” Trekkers’ responsibilities include carrying loads and blazing trails for climbers on mountain expeditions. The defendant was a professional trekker who led tourists on climbs most recently in the mountains near Kathmandu. Off-season, he farmed potatoes with his family in Phortze.

Sherpa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.