Pedrina v. Chun
Opinion
Opinion
97 F.3d 1296 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 9137 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7558 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12 ,417 Raymond PEDRINA, Luz Pedrina, Jupiterrex Uraniumrhi and Rosita Uraniumrhi, Plaintiffs, Leonard Wong and Cheryl Wong; Isidro Dilay; Margaret S. Dilay; Lorraine Dilay; Nicanor Amit; Alejandro Coloyan and Ofelia Coloyan; Raphael Kamai and Lynda Augustus; Alfredo Aurio, Sr. and Benita Aurio; Jennie Olinger; James Jones and Loretta Jones; Sebastian Igarta and Estrella Igarta; Wilfredo M. Bolo and Josefina V. Bolo; Cristita Bolo; Francisco Pedrina and Adoracion Pedrina; Frances C. Miguel; William Sullivan and Jocelyn Sullivan; Violeta Dumadag; John Batalona; Cipriano Manuel; Severo Duque; Milnor Lum; Peter Barcia and Julie Barcia, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Han Kuk CHUN; Tetsuo Yasuda; Y.Y. Valley Corporation, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Masanori Kobayashi; Yoshinori "Ken" Hayashida; City and County of Honolulu and Mayor Frank F. Fasi; Robert Carter; Eugene Lum and Norma Lum; Ernest Souza; Hiroshi Kobayashi, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-16477, 95-16782. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1996. Decided Oct. 10, 1996.…