Island Navigation Co. v. M/V Viking Serenade

Good Law
35 F. App'x 524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 2002No. 01-55052; D.C. No. CV 97-3519 CASCalifornia1,591 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Island Navigation appeals from the judgment of the district court. Island Navigation asserts several grounds for appeal, challenging the district court’s setting the case for trial on short notice, challenging the district court’s interpretation of the tariff schedule, and challenging the district court’s evidentiary rulings.

Island Navigation first contends that the district court abused its discretion by setting the case for trial on two business days’ notice. Under the circumstances, there was no abuse of discretion. The record demonstrates that the case had been set for pretrial conference and for trial numerous times throughout the several years of the litigation, following ordinary procedures, but those dates had been continued as the case progressed. By the time trial was to be finally set, the court had already granted judgment against Island Navigation on its claims and had determined which tariff rate applied. In addition, the parties had already agreed upon much of the evidence, leaving only one factual issue to be determined-the average number of Island Navigation’s boats which serviced Royal Caribbean’s cruise ship. On this issue, the parties had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.