LaVoie v. State of Ariz.

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas LAVOIE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona; Pima County Voters Registration Recorders' Office; Mike Boyd, former recorder; F. Ann Rodriquez, Pima County Elected Recorder; Delores Johnston, Pima County Recorders' Office Employee; L. Bahill; Christopher Straub; Coatie Richie; Lt. Bowman; Wesley Brehm; R. Cremeans, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16581. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 26, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thomas LaVoie, Sr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissals and summary judgments in favor of defendants in LaVoie's action alleging that, by requiring a residential address, Arizona's voting registration is unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo both a dismissal for failure to state a claim, see…