Messerschmidt v. State of Ariz.

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eugene D. MESSERSCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Charles Cowan, Director, Arizona Department of Economic Security; Timothy M. Hogan, Executive Director, Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest; Linda J. Blessing, Director of EEOC, Defendants, and Richard Riley, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; William L. Smith, Acting Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 25, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eugene Messerschmidt appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging that defendants discriminated against him on the basis of disability. Specifically, Messerschmidt claimed that defendants failed to fund his business plan pursuant to section 641 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29…