Rodimir Elias v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
97 F.3d 1459·1996 WL 547975·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199696-70000California796 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rodimir ELIAS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 96-70000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 25, 1996. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Ars-owp-fsf. B.I.A. REVIEW DENIED. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodimir Elias, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision denying Elias' request for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1) because Elias failed to show that his deportation would result in extreme hardship. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 3 We review for abuse of discretion the BIA's decision to deny an application for suspension of deportation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.