Fidel v. Young

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bernard FIDEL; Joe Binder, in in their capacity as proposed intervenors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and John Glavaris; Patricia Glavaris; Benny L. Tolley, Plaintiffs, v. Herbert J. YOUNG; James A. Thayer; Jay Janis; John R. Williamson; Jerome Nussbaum; Michael W. Mooney; Lynne Crawford; Linda K.S. Blount; Robert R. Sprague; Houston I. Flournoy; Bernice Huter; Melvin P. Spitz; Rafael E. Vega; Gibraltar Savings; Gibraltar Savings, F.A. Melvin Rifkind, et al.; KPMG Peat Marwick; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Ernst & Whinney; Ernst & Young; William H. Dudley; Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Gibraltar Savings; Melvin Rifkind; Rifkind, Pondel & Parson; Kenneth Leventhal; Richard Sprayregen; Jerome Nussbaum; Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1996. Decided Sept. 16, 1996. 1 Before: FLETCHER and…