Hemopet, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Homeopet Llc, Defendant-Counter-Claimants-Appellees

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. HEMOPET, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. HOMEOPET LLC, et al., Defendant-counter-claimants-Appellees. No. 96-55336. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 26, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002 , 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995). The record before us shows that the district court did not base its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact in concluding that appellant failed to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion in the consuming…