Loomis v. Vernon

Good Law
97 F.3d 1459·1996 WL 547938·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199695-35508California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1459 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael J. LOOMIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard A. VERNON, Director, Idaho Department of Corrections; Dave Paskett, Administrator of Prisons for Idaho; Arvon Arave, Warden of the IMSI; Debbie Shields, Associate Warden of IMSI; Lynn White, Medical Services Manager for IMSI; Dr. Richard Gardner; Dr. Rex Borup, Contract doctor for IMSI; Lelia Schutt, Head Nurse or CRMP for IMSI, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35508. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 25, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael J. Loomis appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Idaho Maximum Security Institution ("IMSI") in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the prison medical staff were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment in their treatment of his back pain. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.