Mondor v. Vessel Hai Mong

Good Law
97 F.3d 1460·1996 WL 534026·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40167
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 199694-55077California5,191 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cora MONDOR, individually, and as heir to the estate of Edmond J. Mondor, Jr., and as the personal representative of the estate of Edmond J. Mondor, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The VESSEL "HAI MONG"; Hyundai Merchant Marine Corporation; Graham & James, Defendants-Appellees, and Metropolitan Stevedore Company, Claimant. No. 94-55077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1995. Decided Sept. 19, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Edmond Mondor, Jr. was killed while working aboard the vessel Hai Mong. Appellant Cora Mondor, Edmond Mondor's widow, brought this wrongful death and survival action under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, which gives longshoreworkers a cause of action against a vessel for negligence. See 33 U.S.C. § 905 (b). 1 After the jury deadlocked 6-2 in favor of the defendants on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.