Nordell Intern. Resources Ltd. v. Triton Oil

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NORDELL INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES LTD., Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, v. TRITON OIL, Defendant, and Triton Indonesia Incorporated; Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiffs-Appellants. No. 94-56110. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1995. Decided May 3, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges MEMORANDUM * Triton Indonesia, Inc. and Triton Energy Corporation appeal the district court's judgment, following this court's remand in a prior appeal, finding that Veronex Resources, Ltd. had not consented to a determination of its alter ego status by an arbitration panel and that Veronex was not the alter ego of Nordell International Resources, Ltd. In this action brought under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 11 , Triton alleges that Nordell and Veronex violated an agreement for the operation and development of an oil-producing field in…