Moises Narvaez-Diaz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
97 F.3d 1460·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40180
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199695-70013California595 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Moises NARVAEZ-DIAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70013. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1996. * Decided Sept. 23, 1996. 1 Petition to Review a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Ayq-paz-vqy. 2 B.I.A. 3 REVIEW DENIED. 4 Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges and WINMILL, ** District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Petitioner Moises Narvaez-Diaz petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 , 1253(h); Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") §§ 208, 243(h). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 7 To reverse the BIA's refusal to grant asylum, an applicant "must demonstrate that the 'evidence [she] presented was so compelling that no reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.