Patterson v. City of Seattle

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel S. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Robert P. Gronczack, Teresita Batayola, Donna Kimbrough-Johnson, Rodney Oliver, John Okamoto, Norman B. Rice, and Robert Watt, each in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1996. Decided Sept. 17, 1996. Before: REAVLEY, * REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Daniel S. Patterson, a former employee of the City of Seattle, sued the City and several of its officials and employees for damages and other relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Washington Law Against Discrimination, RCW 49.60, alleging discrimination and unlawful retaliation. The district court granted summary judgment as to all defendants on all claims, and Patterson…