Morgan v. Del Papa

Good Law
97 F.3d 1460·1996 WL 554463·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40173
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 199695-16918California516 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter D. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frankie Sue DEL PAPA; Robert Miller, Nevada Legislature; Nevada Department Parole and Probation Does 1-250; Robin Bates; Robert Behr, Lupe Gunderson; Cheryl Lau; Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Nevada Department of Prisons; John Slansky; State of Nevada and Sue Wagner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16918. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 26, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Walter D. Morgan appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for failure to comply with the court's order to amend the deficiencies of his complaint. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 3 We construe the district court's dismissal as a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), review for an abuse of discretion, and affirm.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.