Morgan v. Del Papa
Opinion
Opinion
97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter D. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frankie Sue DEL PAPA; Robert Miller, Nevada Legislature; Nevada Department Parole and Probation Does 1-250; Robin Bates; Robert Behr, Lupe Gunderson; Cheryl Lau; Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Nevada Department of Prisons; John Slansky; State of Nevada and Sue Wagner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16918. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 26, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Walter D. Morgan appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for failure to comply with the court's order to amend the deficiencies of his complaint. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 3 We construe the district court's dismissal as a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), review for an abuse of discretion, and affirm.…