Jerardo Rodriguez v. Cook, Director George Baldwin, Spt H.O. Scroghan

Good Law
97 F.3d 1460·1996 WL 547961·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40179
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199695-36166California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1460 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COOK, Director; George Baldwin, SPT; H.O. Scroghan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 25, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Jerardo Rodriguez appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice for failing to comply with an order requiring Rodriguez to timely file an amended complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal for abuse of discretion, see Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992), and we affirm. 3 Rodriguez contends that the district court abused its discretion by not considering less drastic sanctions before it dismissed his action with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.