United States v. Jose Alfredo Carrillo-Espinoza, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Carrillo-Espinoza

Good Law
97 F.3d 1461
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 199695-10518California570 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1461 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Alfredo CARRILLO-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose Alfredo CARRILLO-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-10596, 95-10518. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 1996. Submission Deferred June 17, 1996. Resubmitted Aug. 28, 1996. Decided Aug. 30, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Jose Carrillo-Espinoza was indicted by a federal grand jury for tax evasion (Counts 1-4), money laundering (Counts 5-6), conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana (Count 7), conspiracy to import marijuana (Count 8), importation of marijuana (Counts 9, 11, 13, 15), possession with intent to distribute marijuana (Counts 10, 12, 14, and 16), and with engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (Count 17). Both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.