Smith v. Feldman

Good Law
97 F.3d 1461·1996 WL 552772·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40221
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199696-15350California901 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1461 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence B. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stanley FELDMAN, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona; James Moeller, Vice Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona; Robert J. Corcoran, Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona; Frederick J. Martone, Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona; Thomas A. Zlaket, Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona; Robert B. Van Wyck, Board of Governors of the State Bar of Arizona; Raymond W. Brown Constituting the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Arizona; Thomas M. Thompson; Charles A. Irwin; J. William Brammer; Michael L. Piccareta; Dee-Dee Samett; Don Bivens; Michael D. Kimerer; John E. Lundin; Peter A. Neisser; Janet K. Phillips; Jose De Jesus Rivera; Charles W. Wirken; Gloria G. Ybarra; Waldo W. Isreal; Kirk V. Karman; Reverend John S. Goldstein; Marvin E. Perry, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15350. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1996. * Decided Sept. 27,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.