United States v. Jose Carbajal

97 F.3d 1461 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose CARBAJAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1996. Decided May 09, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM * Defendant-Appellant Jose Carbajal appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Carbajal contends (1) insufficient evidence supported the jury's verdicts, and (2) the district court's two-level obstruction of justice enhancement was clearly erroneous. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm. 1 Sufficient evidence supported the jury's guilty verdicts. A government witness testified that Carbajal told him "he was a distributor and transporter of the methamphetamine that was being sold…