United States v. Gerrod Moses Goudy

Good Law
97 F.3d 1462·1996 WL 528438·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40371
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 199695-30377California306 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1462 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerrod Moses GOUDY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30377. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1996. * Decided Sept. 13, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gerrod Moses Goudy appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for assault within Indian Country resulting in serious bodily injury in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(f). Goudy's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 786 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The plea agreement includes a waiver of any right of appeal "except the right to appeal a sentence imposed outside the guideline range determined applicable by the Court." Because the sentence imposed is within the guideline range determined applicable by the district court and our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.