United States v. Anthony Joseph Marks

Good Law
97 F.3d 1462·1996 WL 528487·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 199696-10066California640 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1462 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Joseph MARKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-10066. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1996. * Decided Sept. 13, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Joseph Marks appeals the district court's judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to a 12-month term of imprisonment. He contends that the district court erred by: (1) imposing a sentence outside the Chapter 7 Sentencing Guidelines and (2) failing to provide an adequate statement of reasons for the sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm. 3 Marks was sentenced to four years probation after pleading guilty to misprison of a felony. Subsequently, the government filed a petition alleging Marks had violated a condition of his probation by failing to cooperate with the government.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.