Andre Brigham Young v. Irwin S. Dreiblatt, Individually and in His Official Capacity Savio Chan

97 F.3d 1463 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andre Brigham YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irwin S. DREIBLATT, individually and in his official capacity; Savio Chan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35808. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1996. * Decided Sept. 13, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andre Brigham Young, a former Washington inmate who is civilly confined pursuant to the Washington Sexually Violent Predators Act, Wash.Rev.Code §§ 71.09.010-71.09.902 ("the Act"), appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking compensatory, declaratory, and injunctive relief against the psychiatrists who recommended his civil confinement as well as an expungement of false information from his prison record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal of an…