Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. Yosemite Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Cross-Appellee, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
97 F.3d 1463·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199694-55000California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1463 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee. YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Cross-Appellee, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Appellee. No. 94-55000, 94-55001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided July 26, 1996. 1 Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, * District Judge. 2 ORDER WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM, DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.