Alan G. Wilson v. United States

Good Law
97 F.3d 1463·1996 WL 520277·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40235
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 199695-35173California426 words

Opinion

Opinion

97 F.3d 1463 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alan G. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35173. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 15, 1996. * Decided Sept. 12, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alan G. Wilson appeals, pro se, the district court's dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Feres doctrine. Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and affirm. 3 Wilson served in the Army from February 1974 through January 1976. In September 1975, while on active duty Wilson was placed in a correctional custody facility for having been absent without leave. Wilson alleges that his Eighth Amendment right was violated when he was harassed and beaten while at the correctional facility, and that his Fifth Amendment right was violated when he was appointed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.