Vilmos Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Ft Royal King, 592205 and Royal Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Vilmos Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Royal Seafoods Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Ft Royal King, 592205, Vilmos Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Royal Seafoods Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Ft Royal King, 592205

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 12893·98 F.3d 514·1997 A.M.C. 92·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27442·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7787
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 199695-35197California2,330 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 514 1997 A.M.C. 92 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7787 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12 ,893 Vilmos FUSZEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROYAL KING FISHERIES, INC., a Washington corporation; Ft Royal King, # 592205; and Royal Seafoods, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Vilmos FUSZEK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROYAL KING FISHERIES, INC., a Washington corporation; Royal Seafoods Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ft Royal King, # 592205, Defendant. Vilmos FUSZEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROYAL KING FISHERIES, INC., a Washington corporation; Royal Seafoods Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Ft Royal King, # 592205, Defendant. Nos. 95-35197, 95-35840 and 95-35874. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 1996. Decided Oct. 23, 1996. Howard M. Goodfriend, Edwards, Sieh, Hathaway, Smith & Goodfriend, Seattle, WA; David Merritt Beninger, Luvera, Barnett, Brindley, Beninger & Cunningham, Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Robert N. Windes, LeGros, Buchanan & Paul, Seattle, WA, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.