United States v. State Of Washington

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 12887·98 F.3d 1159·36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 66·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27479·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7792
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 199695-35202California5,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1159 65 USLW 2297 , 36 Fed.R.Serv.3d 66 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7792, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12 ,887 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Duwamish Indian Tribe; Snohomish Indian Tribe; Steilacoom Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Hoh Indian Tribe; Lummi Indian Nation; Skokomish Indian Tribe; Jamestown Band of Klallams; Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe; Port Gamble Band Clallam; Muckleshoot Indian Tribe; Quinault Indian Nation; Quileute Indian Tribe; Tulalip Tribe; Makah Indian Tribe; Suquamish Indian Tribe; Puyallup Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Nooksack Tribe; Upper Skagit Tribe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35202. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1995. Decided Oct. 23, 1996. Tim Atkeson, Arnold & Porter, Denver, CO; Dennis J. Whittlesey, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-intervenors-appellants. David C. Shilton, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellee. Fronda Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Fish and Wildlife, Olympia,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.