Jimenez

Jimenez v. City of Phoenix

Good Law
35 F. App'x 666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 2002No. 01-16878; D.C. No. CV-98-01945-EHCCalifornia109 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marco Antonio' Jimenez appeals the district court’s order striking the “First Amended Complaint” he submitted seven months after entry of judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, see Maljack Prods., Inc. v. GoodTimes Home Video Corp., 81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir.1996), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed August 1, 2001.

*667 Jimenez’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.