Paul A. Wright v. Chase Riveland Neal Brown Keith Shouvillier Mark Crewson

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chase RIVELAND; Neal Brown; Keith Shouvillier; Mark Crewson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35710. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul A. Wright appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by retaliating against him for filing an inmate grievance. Wright also challenges the district court's award of costs to the defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Wright contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for the defendants because a triable issue exists as to whether defendant Crewson issued an infraction against Wright…