Blake v. Kernan

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin James BLAKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peggy KERNAN, Warden; A.C. Newland, Chief Deputy Warden; J. Silva, Associate Warden; E. Terry, Correctional Lieutenant; C/O Bickle, Correctional Lieutenant; M. Loftin, Correctional Counselor II; R. Stanich, Correctional Counselor II; B. Welch, Correctional Counselor II; C/O Hall, Correctional Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Melvin James Blake, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Blake's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials deprived Blake of his right to due process during disciplinary hearings which led to Blake's placement in administrative segregation based upon a finding that he was…