Edward R. Dupass v. Lamont Lester Skousen

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward R. DUPASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lamont Lester SKOUSEN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-17170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward R. DuPass appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Lamont Lester Skousen in Dupass's action alleging that Skousen violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., by performing accident reconstruction services for DuPass without a private investigator's license. The complaint also alleged that Skousen conspired with his wife to violate RICO, fraudulently led DuPass to believe he had a license in order to obtain payment for his services, and violated the provisions of A.R.S. § 13-2301 et seq. related to fraudulent schemes. 3 The district court dismissed…