Leonardo Bravo-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
98 F.3d 1345·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 199695-70446California776 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonardo BRAVO-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70446. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 19, 1996. * Decided Oct. 2, 1996. 1 Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Avw-dct-oqt. 2 B.I.A. 3 REVIEW DENIED. 4 Before: CANBY and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. ** 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Leonardo Bravo-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily dismissing his appeal from a decision of an Immigration Judge which denied his application for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254 . We deny the petition. 7 1. "The [BIA] may summarily dismiss any appeal or portion of any appeal in any case in which ... [t]he party concerned fails to specify the reasons for the appeal on [the notice of appeal]." 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.