Alex Anaya, Jr. v. T. White, Warden of Folsom Prison, California State Prison System Attorney General of the State of California

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alex ANAYA, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. WHITE, Warden of Folsom Prison, California State Prison System; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-55996. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alex Anaya, Jr., appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Anaya contends that: 1) insufficient evidence supported an enhancement to his sentence for burglary; 2) his thirty-two-year sentence for burglary constituted cruel and unusual punishment; and 3) the state trial court erroneously imposed six consecutive sentence enhancements. We review de novo a district court's decision on a § 2254 petition. Duckett v. Godinez, 67 F.3d 734, 739 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1549 (1996). We have jurisdiction…