Harrison v. Barbour

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerry D. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet BARBOUR, individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of Twin Rivers Correction Center; Tom Rolfs, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1996. * Decided Oct. 4, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harrison appeals the dismissal of his action, which alleged that prison officials deprived him of due process by terminating his extended family visitation ("EFV") privilege pursuant to a new EFV directive. Harrison raises several other constitutional challenges on appeal. 3 Harrison is an inmate at the correctional facility in Monroe, Washington. He and his wife participated in the EFV program for six years. The EFV program allows a family member to stay with an inmate in a…