Frederick v. City of Portland

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randy D. FREDERICK and Loren D. Roper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Portland Development Commission, Metropolitan Exposition-Recreation Commission, Portland Trail Blazers Inc., and Oregon Arena Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35389. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 18, 1996. Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: ALDISERT * , PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs-appellants Randy Frederick and Loren Roper appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Oregon Arena Corporation and Trailblazers, Inc. 1 Frederick and Roper allege reverse race discrimination by defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) ("Title VII"). 3 Plaintiffs raise the following four issues on appeal: 4 1. Did the district court err in striking, as inadmissible hearsay, portions of an affidavit? 5 2. Did the…