Garcia v. Gomez

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Benito Arenicia GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director and California Department of Corrections, Defendants, and Ivalee Henry; T. Zink, Chief Deputy Warden; D. Custard, Program Administrator; B. Powell, Correctional Counselor II; J. Ossman, Correctional Counselor; J. Rodgers, Correctional and Parole Representative; B. Duball, Associate Warden; K. Sisto and R. Casillas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1996. * Decided Oct. 2, 1996. Before: CANBY and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. ** MEMORANDUM *** Benito Arenicia Garcia appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against California State Prison officials. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . He asserts that the officials violated his rights when they improperly gave him and then refused to remove an "R" suffix classification. He also claims that…