Ortega-Salinas

United States v. Ortega-Salinas

Good Law
35 F. App'x 671
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 2002No. 01-30309; D.C. No. CR-00-02189-AAMCalifornia347 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ciro Ortega-Salinas appeals his 84-month sentence, imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to one count of possession of 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Ortega-Salinas contends that the district court erroneously counted two prior uncounseled state misdemeanor convictions, which raised his criminal history score from II to IV. We are unpersuaded. The 1993 conviction for having no valid operator’s license is not properly before us because Ortega-Salinas failed to object below. See United States v. Flores-Payon, 942 F.2d 556, 558 (9th Cir.1991). Nevertheless, it would have been properly included for the same reasons as the 1994 conviction discussed below.

This court reviews de novo the “district court’s determination that a particular conviction may be used in calculating a defendant’s criminal history score.” United States v. Allen, 153 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir.1998). The defendant bears the “ultimate burden of proof in demonstrating the constitutional infirmity” of the prior conviction at issue by a preponderance of the evidence.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.