Charles E. Cashaw v. William L. Callahan, Superintendent, Micc Rosemary Rouston, Records Supervisor, Micc, and Indeterminate Sentence Review Board

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles E. CASHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. CALLAHAN, Superintendent, MICC; Rosemary Rouston, Records Supervisor, MICC, Defendants-Appellees, and Indeterminate Sentence Review Board, Defendant. No. 95-35240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles E. Cashaw, a Washington state prisoner, appeals the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim concerning defendants Callahan and Routson in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review a district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1990). We may affirm on any grounds supported by the record. Granite State Ins. Co. v. Smart Modular Techs., Inc., 76 F.3d…