David M. David v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Richard Sponseller Ben Burch Michael J. Yamaguchi Albert Glenn Robert Twiss

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David M. DAVID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General; Richard Sponseller; Ben Burch; Michael J. Yamaguchi; Albert Glenn; Robert Twiss, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15227. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Michael David appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his application for a writ of mandamus. In the writ, David asked the district court to compel the United States Attorney, or on its own initiative, to convene a grand jury, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1332 (a). He also sought an investigation into alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act by those responsible for David's state arrest, prosecution and conviction for oral copulation with a minor, and for alleged wrongs suffered while he was incarcerated. Finally,…