Justin Areola-Calderon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
98 F.3d 1345·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 199694-70226California2,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Justin AREOLA-CALDERON, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70226. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 19, 1996. * Decided Oct. 3, 1996. Petition to Review a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Aik-lsc-mys. B.I.A. REMANDED. Before: KOZINSKI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** PER CURIAM: FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1 Petitioner Justino Arreola-Calderon is a 45-year-old citizen of Mexico who entered the United States illegally in 1985. In 1989 and 1990, his wife and six children, all Mexican citizens, illegally entered the country to join him. Petitioner worked here as a carpenter until he was injured on the job in September 1992. 2 On November 14, 1991, the INS issued an Order to Show Cause why Arreola-Calderon should not be deported for having entered the United States without inspection,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.