Cannon v. California Dept. of Corrections

98 F.3d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tyrrall Farrow CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; James Gomez, Warden; Bruce Farris, Assistant Warden; I. Williams, Chief Deputy Warden; J. Mefford, D.A. Johnson, Record Specialist; California State Board of Control; George Smith; M. Meske; R; V. Bluestein; P. Perez; M.P. McClure and D. Pehrson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Tyrrall Farrow Cannon appeals pro se the district court's order adopting a magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss Cannon's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , see McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1053-54 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm. 3 Cannon…