Robert M. Mayes v. United States

98 F.3d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert M. MAYES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-56818. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Robert M. Mayes appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He contends the district court erred when it denied him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 594 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm. 3 On May 27, 1969, Mayes pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery. At his Rule 11 hearing, Mayes testified that: he was subject to a twenty-year maximum sentence; no person had promised him any particular sentence; counsel had not…