John Edward Pratt v. United States

98 F.3d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Edward PRATT, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-56757. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Edward Pratt, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . 1 Pratt contends that: 1) the district court erroneously denied his petition without making findings or conclusions; 2) the United States Parole Commission ("Commission") lacked authority, after revoking Pratt's parole, to impose the unexpired term from his 1978 conviction consecutively to an unrelated federal sentence; 3) the parole violation warrant was executed in January 1988, thus affecting when the parole revocation term begins and the computation of good-time credits; 4) Pratt had a…