Ono v. Floyd

98 F.3d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul Masaru ONO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.E. FLOYD, Warden; J. Slade; J. Pendleton; W. Butler, Counselor N-A; Capt. Chalmers; Mr. Groover, Counselor; Mr. Gardiner, Unicor Foreman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 9, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Paul Masaru Ono appeals pro se the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction in his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 We generally review the denial of a preliminary injunction for an abuse of discretion. Beno v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir.1994). However, legal issues underlying the decision to deny preliminary relief are reviewed de novo. Id. 4…