In re Seagate Technology II Securities Litigation

98 F.3d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY II SECURITIES LITIGATION. Michael F. ANDERSON, on behalf of himself and the certified class of purchasers of common stock of Seagate Technology Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY; Alan Shugart; David Charles Mitchell; Donald Waite; Douglas Mahon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 18, 1996. Decided Oct. 2, 1996. Before: CHOY, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Michael F. Anderson, on behalf of himself and a class of investors, appeals the district court's determinations which dismissed part of and granted summary judgment on the remainder of his securities fraud action against Seagate Technology Inc. and certain of its officers (Seagate). He contends that Seagate, a generally successful company, violated the securities law during a limited period in 1988, which caused those…