Ervin Charles St. Amand v. James H. Gomez George A. Smith, M. Kramer, Sergeant S. Grandy Lackey Silva Bennett D.F. Nunes Hernandez

98 F.3d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ervin Charles ST. AMAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ; George A. Smith, M. Kramer, Sergeant; S. Grandy; Lackey; Silva; Bennett; D.F. Nunes; Hernandez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16648. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 11, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Ervin Charles St. Amand appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He contends the district court erred when it dismissed his action for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. A. Background 3 On February 17, 1995, the district court filed St. Amand's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction. On May 19, 1995, the magistrate judge recommended that the…