United States v. Julius C. Campo

98 F.3d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julius C. CAMPO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. * Decided Oct. 10, 1996. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Julius Campo appeals the forty-one month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to commit mail theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . Campo contends the district court erred by sentencing him as an organizer or leader of criminal activity and by enhancing his sentence both for his leadership role and for being in the business of receiving and selling stolen property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error the findings that underlie a district court's sentencing decision. United States v. Pinkney, 15 F.3d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1994). The government must prove facts justifying an…